Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 25, 1989 <br />Cellular One Roger•s r•epor~ted that Cellular~ One is planning for the future and building <br />(Cont.) their system to meet the needs of the public. Roger•s stated that <br />although the grid systems may be differ•ent, the two systems are not <br />incompatible and could both be mounted on the water tower•. <br />Swanson asked if the Council is accepting the price offered by Cellular <br />One, or if the Council negotiated a higher price. <br />Fahey reported that Cellular One originally offered $400 per month, <br />and the Council inquir•ed as to what other cities ar•e receiving and the <br />$600 per month figure was arrived at. <br />Swanson r•ecommend.ed that a lease amount double or tr~iple the $600 per <br />month would be more appropriate. Swanson pointed out the cost to <br />Cellular One if they had to er•ect their own tower. Swanson also suggested <br />that a r~equest for• a bid be sent to U.S. West as well. <br />Fahey replied that the City pr•efer•s not to have another• tower• erected <br />in the City and pointed out that Cellular One had proposed this a <br />couple of years ago. Fahey felt a separate tower would be much more <br />of an eyesore than mounting the equipment on the City's water tower. <br />Fahey pointed out that erecting a separate tower would be an under~- <br />utilization of a proper•ty since Cellular One only needs a small <br />equipment building in addition to the tower~. <br />Swanson stated that he felt the City's water• tower~ was an eyesore, <br />and commented that the tower was constructed without the benefit of <br />any public hearings. Swanson pointed out that he may be interested <br />in developing his property and felt the water• tower• and the Cellular <br />One equipment both devalued his property. Swanson stated that he was <br />opposed to the pr~oposal and also felt the amount of rent was too low. <br />There was no one else fr•om the general public present wishing to speak. <br />Mr•. Blesener~ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 89-1-27 - CLOSING TNE PUBLIC <br />HEARI~IG ON TNE CELLULAR ONE REQUEST FOR <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR USE OF TNE CITY'S <br />WATER TOWER AS A TRANSMISSION FACILITY <br />The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr. LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Dook No. 21, Page 28. <br />Scalze asked the length of the lease. <br />The City Attorney replied that the <br />additional 5,year terms. After the <br />lease is a 5-year lease with 5 <br />first 5 year~s either~ the landlord <br />Page -7- <br />