Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />April 26, 1989 <br />Fahey asked if ther•e was anyone fr•om the gener~al public pr~esent wishinq to <br />comment on this matter•. Ther~e was not, and the public hearinq was closed. <br />Mr~. Fahey intr•oduced the followinq resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 89-4-155 - CLOSING THE PUftLIC <br />HEARING ON THF SWANSON DEVFLOPMENT CONCEPT <br />The for~eqoinq r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr~. Blesener•. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Rlesener•, Collova, Scalze, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />~1r~. LaValle introduced the followinq r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 89-4-156 - APPROVING THE CONCEPT <br />OF THE SWANSON DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, OPTION #2, <br />CO~ITINGENT UPON THE PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO <br />THF PARK COMMISSION FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATION ON <br />PARK DEDICATION, AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER STUDY <br />BY THE CITY ENGINEER OF THF CITY PLANNER'S <br />RECOMMENDATION FOR A STREET STUB TO THF HUOT PROPFRTY <br />The foreqoinq resolution was duly seconded by Mr. [~lesener. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Blesener, Scalze, Fahey, Colloa. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />P1r. Blesener intr•oduced the followinq resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 89-4-157 - INSTRUCTING THE CITY <br />PLANNER AND CITY ENGI~IEER TO WORK WITH THE <br />CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SWANSON PROPERTY <br />AND LOOK AT THE RECOMMFNDATION OF THE CITY <br />PLAN~IER FOR A STRFET STUR TO THE HUOT PROPERTY <br />TO DETERMINE IF THIS STUB IS NECESSARY FOR <br />TRAFFIC FLOId AS WELL AS TO PREVENT THE LANDLOCKING <br />OF THE HUOT PROPERTY <br />The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded b.y Mr•. Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Dlesener, Collova, Scalze, Fahey, LaValle. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Paqe -5- <br />