Laserfiche WebLink
C4inutes <br />City Council <br />P4ay 24 0 1989 <br />Stellick Pdr. Stellick indicated that this was correct and that it was <br />Property discussed at the Council meeting four or five years ago. <br />Division Mrs. Scalze suggested that an easement being over Garden <br />(cont.) Terrace's property should be researched for she did not <br />recall any, <br />r1r. Fahey felt that if the Council approved the subdivision, <br />anyone that wants to develop the property would have to <br />comply with existing City codes which could include the <br />placement of an appropriate road for fire service, or at <br />least access on the piece of property that is there, <br />P~1r. Grittman stated that the lo~ does not have any street <br />frontage. Mr, Grittman felt that if they were going to <br />expand Garden Terrace or if they ~aere going to expand the <br />P~larket Place, that would be an amendment to their existing <br />claims to develop. City action would be required for that. <br />Nlr. Grit~man indicated that the problem that the Council has <br />and the reason they are suggesting a plat is ~vithout any <br />street frontage, if the parcel were to become a separate <br />1ot, they could sell it to someone else even though they <br />have no intention of doing that now. Someone else could say <br />that they were meeting all of their setbacks and that they <br />want to build a building there with no access and no <br />opportunity for the senior revie~a or asic L•or further <br />easements, or any~hinq lilce that, because they would not be <br />subdividing at that time. They ~vould be building on an <br />individual lot. Mr. Gri~tman indicated that it was the <br />Council's intention to plat the property that already has a <br />two page legal description and malce it an outlot so that C•~ro <br />Stellick could do no development on it until it w~s Eurther <br />platted or center expansion comes in or to provide access to <br />the rear or side or wherever that access 4~as to go. <br />Mr. Grittman indicated that he wanted to preclude any <br />development on the parcel until the City knew where the <br />access was to go. <br />T~9r. Pahey stated that if the Council makes it an outlot, the <br />public will krzow that it is not buildable, Mr, Grittman <br />agreed, P~]r. Fahey asked i9r. Stellick if this was acceptable <br />to him. ri1r, Stellick felt that it was; however, ~vanted to <br />know if they provide cross-easement pariting to the 1ot, <br />would it solve the ~ublic access issue. <br />Page °12- <br />