Laserfiche WebLink
~4inutes <br />City Council <br />f4ay 2~ P 19II9 <br />Stellick Mr, Fahey f•elt that the Council should refer the matter to <br />Property the City Attorney and/or Park Comm9.ssion for a determination <br />Division as to cahether a park charge is applicable. Mrse Scalze <br />(cont.) indicated that the Park Commission is only a recommending <br />policy setting body. [~irs. Scalze did not Icnoso if the <br />Commission could legally research the ordinance to determine <br />if the parls charge is applicable, <br />Mr. Fahey asked r~r, Sweeney what his opinion 4~as on the <br />matter. Mr. Scaeeney indicated that he had no opinion at <br />that time. <br />Mr, I~lesener asked if the parlc charye could have previously <br />been charged be£ore when it was subdividecl, Mr, Chlebeck <br />stated tha~ he did not recall, P4r, Chlebeck asked P4r. <br />Stellick when it had been subdivided before. Mr, StellicY, <br />presumed it was around 1976 or 1977, <br />Mr. Fahey indicated that the Council should approve the lot <br />split subject to the cletermination by the City Attorney as <br />to whether the park charge is applicable and if so, <br />Mr. Stellick would have to pay the appropriate park charge <br />per ordinance, r~ir. Fahey felt tha~ this situation ~~as <br />clearly different from the Howe/DeBace situation, but felt <br />that ~1r. Stellick could ~vork ~aith Nlr. Sweeney on the <br />matter. b4r. Fahey stated tha~ i~ T4r. Sweeney felt that it <br />was a matter that the Council should consider further, the <br />Council Wiii talce it up again, <br />P4r, LaValle asked ho~a close to the building the property <br />line would be, P~lr. LaValle was told that the property line <br />would be right adjacent to the building, r1r. LaValle <br />commented that a roadway for police and fire trucks may not <br />be around the building. hZr. Stellick indicated that there <br />would be a roadway. Mr. Stellick stated that when they sold <br />the site for the housing, the site Icept growing so this <br />boundry line here moved yet the price did not change. <br />birs. Scalze asked if the southerly property line was <br />adjacent to Garden Terrace's property, 1~9rs, Scalze ~•ras told <br />that it was Garden Terrace's property line. <br />Mrs. Scalze o~anted it clarified. <br />~ahen Mr, Stellick is talking about <br />adjacent property, is he sayiny an <br />Terrace's property, <br />[-1rs. Scalze asked that <br />having an easement across <br />easement across Garden <br />Page -11- <br />