Laserfiche WebLink
P•linutes <br />City Council <br />May 2~, 198~ <br />~L'C' Y `L <br />Amendrnent <br />Signs <br />(cont,) <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />aaoption: <br />R~SOLUTION NO ~9-5-211 - CI~O:iING TEI~ PUI3T,IC <br />IIF;ARSNG ON THF TEXT F1TflFNDt•'IED7T CONCFRNING <br />FRFBSTANDING SIGNS <br />Tkie foregoing resolution was duly s~conded Uy ___~ <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, E~'ahey, LaValle, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />introduced tkae sollowing resolution and moved <br />its adopti.on: <br />P.PSOLUTION~O 89_5T212 - ADOPTING 01:DTNANC~ <br />NO. 315 AS PRL''uPNTED }3Y TF3E PI~E~NN£R ti4ITFT TEIE <br />ADDTTTON OF TF3F WORDS "IiEG~RDLESS OI' TIII; BUIS.DTNG <br />SIZE" [~T THE BP1D OP TIIF FIRST AIVD SP^,COND SENTENCES <br />OF TII~ P~20POSED ORDTNANCE VdITH THE TN~CENTTON I3EING <br />TI3AT b9E ALL06d A 30 POOT STGN I2EGAF2DLESS OF TI3E <br />BUTLDTNG SIZE ALOD7G £REEWAX ACCESS I2011DS OR 4~lITTiIN <br />600 F~~T OF ~CHE INTERSk,CTTON 64ITI1 LT69IT~D ACCESS <br />TO TIIF' FRI^~EbV[1Y <br />'.i'he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Ayes (3) Collova, rahey, LaValle, <br />Dtays (2) F3lesener, Scalze. <br />Pesolution failed, <br />P~r, F3lesener indicated that after much thought and aiter <br />readinc~ ttxe Planner°s report, he ~•rould be F~illing ~o cliange <br />the 30 to 25 feet urhich give nine feet additional onto the <br />Fina sign plus one for eack~ setback foot or ~ehatever that <br />is. PIr, LaValle stated that the problern is that these <br />features were two that were discussea, <br />PIr. Grittman stated that it was about a particular sign that <br />is clearly in excess of tlie City°s sign requirements and <br />that he thought tliat c•~ha~ he said is if you go around in any <br />comrnunity, you ~aill find signs that are far in excess ot tkze <br />siyn ordinances Lor one or t~ao reasons, There v~as either a <br />variance to that sign or the sa.gn was issued prior to the <br />current thing on it, Little Canada has a number oi those <br />tha'c have been brought up. This is the shortcoming of <br />worlciny arouncl everyone's ordinanees. It is not going to <br />tell you ~vhat everyone's sign 19.mits are at if you are using <br />everyone's ordinances as a gauge if your's is reasonable or <br />not, <br />Page -6- <br />