Laserfiche WebLink
N19.nutes <br />City Council <br />P4ay 2~, 19II9 <br />Text pir. Blesener suggested that they start with what t1r, <br />Amendment Grittman has put c(o~m; t~laplesaood with 25 Peet; Roseville <br />Signs Wl~.I1 25 feetp 6Vhite F3ear Lake is lE feet; Vadnais IIeights is <br />(cont.) ?0. If the City went with 25, it ~vould be allocaing the <br />maximum tkiat any o£ the neighboriny cities have. <br />~1r. LaValle felt that this Gaas not truE because tiiere are <br />signs in ~~laplewood and b4hi~e Bear that exceed the 25 feet, <br />P~r, BJ.esener acknowledged tkzis; liowever, felt that tYxe <br />Council was talking about today°s orc~i.nances. ~4r. F3lesener <br />fel~ that those other cities have also changed their <br />ordinances, <br />P1r, E`ahey felt that 30 feet ~•~as too low and felt there had <br />been enough discussion on the issuem <br />~~1rs. Scalze stated that ~Ir. Grittman coulcl check into the <br />rest oi the rnetro area if ti~at is what the Council wantU him <br />to do, <br />t~ir. E~'ahey Eelt that the arnendment sliould have been what is <br />allosved for a building regardless of size, which is within <br />600 teet oi the freeway, and the report he was referring to <br />did not address tYiis, t~irs. Scalze replied that it did <br />address the Pina sign request, <br />Mr. Grittman stated that he dad loolc into what cities ar~ <br />doing with regard to the sign height that they a11ow witkain <br />or aajacen~ to £reeways, t-ir, Grittman indicated that sign <br />heights that are allowed to be next to free~aays vary in <br />commercial districts anysahere from 11 feet to 95 feet within <br />Arden Fii11s, I3loomington, ~3urnsville, Eclen Prairie, Fridley, <br />C-laplewood, Plymouth, Roseville, White Pear and tvoodbury, <br />Page -7- <br />