Laserfiche WebLink
RF i0LU7.'~ON NO 89~6~ 2~49 - AUTFIORIZING TIIP', BIDDING FOR TFIE <br />IRRICATTON SXST~P1 TO LE IN TYdO FORP•1S, TIIP: P-TAIN 11ND TH~ <br />21L'i'ERNAT~ . <br />Tkae foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ~Irs, Scalze. <br />Ayes (3) Scalze, Blesener, LaValle <br />Nays (0) <br />P.esolution declared adopted. <br />t+lrs. Scalze introeluced the iollowinc~ resolution and rnoved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 39-6-250 - AUTIipRTZING &OB VOTO TO LOOK 11T <br />ALL THE FTGURSS FOR PION~~R PARIC TO SEF FIIIER~ THG MOTIEY IS <br />COP~ITNG FROP4 11ND THE ~'IP~'IP LIf<1TTS. <br />The foregoing resolution caas duly seconded by t4r. LaValle <br />Ayes (3) Blesener, LaValle, Scalze <br />Nays (0) <br />Motion declared adopted. <br />1~7rs. Preeman was directecl to help t4r. Voto with these <br />figures. <br />County Rcl. Ii [~9r. Carley presented a report on the reconstruction of <br />County Road S, This will be a cost to ~he City with no one <br />to assess, <br />P7r. LaValle introduced the follo~oing resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTTOTI_NO 89-6-251 - APPROVTNG ALTGNP9ENT 71 OF THE <br />COUNTY ROAD B FEASIBILITI' RrPORT PLACIIVG TI3E CENTPRLINE STX <br />F~ET NORTH OP ITS PRFSFIVT LOCA'SION. <br />C-2r. f3lesener introduced the folloGaing friendly amendmente <br />QUESTIONING TfIE 13L:NEFTT OP TH~ $3~500 TO TITF CTTI' OF LITTLE <br />CANIIDA, `PHE R~AL BEN~F'IT BEING TO TI3E CUB £OOD STORF AND <br />DEVELOPri4PNT ON Tt3E SOUTH SIDF OF COUNTX ROk~D T3, <br />Th~ foregoing resolution was duly seconded by f~ir. LaValle <br />Ayes (3) ~lesener, Scalze, LaValle <br />Nays (0) <br />Resolution declared adoptede <br />Page 11 <br />