My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-89 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
07-18-89 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:52:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
't-7.IL1UTk;S <br />~~~ecial ~'[eeting <br />Ju1~ 1.~, 15~9 <br />7.~8£3 t~uciit th1~: the S~:a~e <br />Fepor~ kno~,~~s until the <br />(conf.) r~oiny to bee <br />has ma~le sorne significant ckiancjes, and no orze <br />State passera a'la;~ dalia~ t}ie _la~,~ is ac'cuaJ..ly <br />t•1r, Voto indicated "~h<~at tkxe increase under 4he Ci.ty's loca7. <br />governrnent aid enabl.ed the Ci'cy to anaintain the ex~ct sazne <br />tax levy and still finance thE cenerll func~ o~aeracions, <br />P~r~, Scalze askecl if the Cii:y go~ mor.~ ~han o~her ci~i~s, <br />P1z. Voto inclicated tha'c the City's 59°; incr~ase is prouaUly <br />one of the highesi:. <br />C4r. Voto stated ~hat the City°s collection r~tes Lor <br />property taxes and specia.l. assessrneni:s looic good, P7r_, Voto <br />re~~or~e<7 that the City cornple~ed negotiat5.ons cai~h L-he <br />St, Pc1u7. ~~7ater Poarc~ and is receiving t:i r.eductaon in ~aacer <br />rates. <br />rir> Vo'co inda.catecl tha~ the P1T.•7C,C dro~~_~ed tlie I,aice Overa`lori <br />Charges, so that e~ill make sorne sa.gnifi.cant ditLerences in <br />tkae future. <br />I~'ir, Voto re~?orted T.~ocal Governmen't t~ici Faen1 7::roan ~?30,000 in <br />19~i8 Lo S36fi,000 in 1.989e Tlae 1~~0 LGA, ~ased on ~:he old <br />1~^f3 la~a, ~aill be about Y4~:0,000 and based on the la~a Chat <br />ti~~1s vetoed, 4~i11 be aboLit 5~2.7.,OOOe tlr, ~Io~o fc~.t that the <br />City should shi.ll get an increase, h1r. Voto staL-ed f~nat tYae <br />City's increasea based upon the vei,oed la~v, is 15~ col~icll is <br />the maxamurn, Mr. Voto inclicated tkaat this woutd not k~e <br />additional revenuey the I~GA ~lus the fax ]evy ior c~enera7. <br />pur_poses taould be the Ci~y's revenue bas~, ti?hen the LGn <br />increases, the t1x levy ~~~i17. go down. <br />blre Voto reported tha~ ~he City can an~iciZ~ate a 3~ iz~crease <br />~?J.us J./? of ihe your ~~opulation oi household increases in <br />19~0 taxes based upon the vetoed la~a, <br />P1r, Voto indicated th~t under Gener~l ancl S~ecial Revenue <br />F'unds, ti~a~e l~icls is ~lo~an to 35~ oL tka~ toi.al. in 19fl9, <br />P-~r, Vo~o stated that the City caz~ expect a n:~ - 5°; increase <br />in the combi.nation of L~~cal Aid and 'che tar, ].evy. P-1re FZk~ey <br />asked if k•1r, VoLO will be ~~ork9.ng Go~i:h D1rs, F'reeman oxi tkie <br />budget, h1rs. ~'reeman stated that si~e must fi.nisYi the ~7une <br />re~orts bef:or.e they si~art on tYa~ budc~et. <br />I~iro I~1ol ind9catecl that 'cl.~e State G•~itl be senc~iny us <br />in:Eormat9.on on tax levi_es by nugus~: 15. I~Ir< Voto stzteci <br />tt~at he woulci let T=Trse Preeman kno~~~ when to scheclule the <br />worlcshop on tt~e budget. <br />P~ge 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.