Laserfiche WebLink
rizrav~~~s <br />City CounciJ. <br />August 23, 19II9 <br />Fahey pointed ou't that the issue has k~een c9iscussecl several <br />times, however, no iormal public hearing has been helc] on <br />the rezoning issue, A public hearin~ ~~~iJ.l be rec{uirecl to go <br />for~~aarcl with a rezoninge E'ahey pointed out that if the City <br />approves the c7eve7.opment ~ro~osala a pub].ic hearing will be <br />scheduled in the fut~ire to consider the rezoning. <br />There were no fur.ther comments irorn the c~eneral public on <br />this matter, <br />r4r< Flesener i.ntrocluced the follos~~ing resolution and movec~ <br />its adoptions <br />RE,C,OL~UTION N0, 89-II-3f3fa - CLOSING TIIP PTIfiI~IC <br />EIPZI~2ING ~_~ <br />The foregoing resolution v~as cluly seconded by Mr. LaVa~le. <br />tlyes (5) Plesen~r, LaValle, ScaJ.ze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted, <br />PIr. ~lesener introduced ~he ~o.llowing resolution and moved <br />i~s acloptione <br />k2E;S0I,UTION D70. B9-£3-387 - 11PPROVTAIG TIIF FIAI2~I, <br />PUD FOR TI1~ S~SOPPTI~7G CE~ITER AD7D SINGI.~P-FAP•1TI~Y <br />REaII)ED7TI1\I., SU~DIVTSION CODtCFPT 11S PRESENTED F3Y <br />120I/POOSALTS SUSJECT TO FINF~L ~1PPROV~L~ OF 'C'II23 <br />DRAINAG~ PLAtQ BY THE CITY F:IVGINFSR AND VT11TEf:aklf3Do <br />WEIICH WILL I3E PRES~N`PED ~T TIIE SEPTEM~2ER C, 1989 <br />AND SiJBJP;CT TO THE RFCOP~IP~IENDATIONS OF TEIE CI7'X <br />PL~D1bTFR ADTD SULJFCT TO PAXMIs1~TT OF T[II? APPItOPRI117'f.:; <br />PARK CEIARGES <br />The ~oregoing resolution iaas ciuly seconcled by Mr. Collovaa <br />F1yes (5) ~37.esener, CoJlova, Scalze, Fahey, z,aValle. <br />DTays (0) e <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />P>oosal.is re~orted that he preva.ously zsked the City to <br />consider allowinc~ a ro6a of p~rltiny along the north s9.de of <br />the proposed shopping center. IIoosalis re~orted that <br />tenants have i.ndicatecl that tlais aclditaonaJ. ~>ariciny as <br />necessarye <br />'.Cim TovmsJ.ey, Iona I,ane resident, reported that at F~as h9s <br />unclerstanding Erom previous discussa.ons that thi.s area woulc~ <br />be sodded, and if additional parlcing was neede~l in tYie <br />future, this ~aould be consi.derede <br />floosalis reported that the sodding ancl landscaping of the <br />area to the north has not been changed, however, it is felt <br />thlt the addi.~ional. parking was necessary in an overf.lov~ <br />Page 7.2 <br />