Laserfiche WebLink
~~znTVTt,s <br />city counci]. <br />'~ugust ?.3, 1989 <br />beiore he T~roceecfs daith the subdivis9.on request, he ~~ould <br />lilce Counc9.1 action on the v~cation, <br />I'ahey asY,ed if there were any rEasori to ex~end Nadeau Roacl <br />in ~he iuttzre, <br />The City Fngineer stated that there are no plans for thc <br />ex'cension of ~ladeau Road. TY~e £ngineer ~ointed out tl~at <br />future road extension plans in this area i.nvolve the <br />extension of F~urke Lane north into the Xorkton Adclition, <br />131esener pointecl out that 1:here coulcl be a road through the <br />center of the I'asciana property, <br />Scalze suggested that it might be ~rematurc to do any road <br />vaclting in this area at ~his time. <br />P,lesener asiced the ~vidth of the rold easement, <br />The City Planner replieci tha~ the easement is 33 feet in <br />~•~ictth. <br />Fahey ~ointed out that even without the roacl vacati.on, Nlr. <br />De flucci could supdivide his lots so ~hat he ~vould k~ave t~ao <br />lots ironting on P,urlce T,ane. <br />T'ahey pointed out tha~ the o~aner of L~ots 1 1nd 2. may make a <br />similar r~quest for vacation of ~iadeau ~;oad, poin~i.ng out <br />that I,ots 1 and 2, could be subdAvided in such a way that <br />the~ woulcl front on Diadeau Roac~. ilowever, there is an <br />exas~iny older horne in ~he center of Lots 1 and 2, <br />Filesener statecl thZt Yie could see no reason not to vacate <br />Nadeau Roacl pointing out that an Zdditional 17 ieet of <br />right-oi-way orould be necesszry for the roac9, and he did no~ <br />beli_eve there ~•~as a neecl for the road to go through. <br />Scalze stated that there a.s no road nlan for tPze area and <br />nointed out that there is a lot o£ uncteveloped property in <br />this area, <br />I'ahey pointecl out that the most li.kely development of tYie <br />area taould be to extend P,urke Lane. F'akiey stated that ia: <br />Nadeau Road viere improved, there caould be a lirnited nurnber <br />of properties that could be assessed, <br />Blesener pointed out that it ~voulc~ be preierable to h~ve a <br />road through the z~'asciana property so that there s>>ou_ld be <br />lots on both sides of the road tha'c could be assessed. <br />mhe City Engineer statecl that he sa~~r no reason s~~ith vacatinq <br />~he roac3. <br />Scalze asked i£ tl~e Ci.ty should re~ain an easemen~ across <br />the pro~~er~y. <br />Page 5 <br />