My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-89 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
08-23-89 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:54:01 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[1IDTUTES <br />City Council <br />August ?..3, 1989 <br />F'ahey felt an easernent c~ras unnecessary ~?ointing out thaf: the <br />C9,ty woula retain drainlge ancl u'cility easements over. the <br />7ot lines. <br />There was no one frora the genera7. ~?ublic present e~ishing to <br />cornment on this matter, <br />Nlr, ~3lesener introduced the follo~~~ing resolution ancl moved <br />i~s adopL•ione <br />RFSOLUTTOiV N0. &9-8-384. - CT~OSTtJG TIT~ PiJL~L~:CC <br />IIL;AP.IDIG + <br />The foregoing resolution v~as du].y seconcled by [Irs. 5ca].ree <br />Ayes (5) I3lesener, Scalze, Fahey, Collova, LaVa].1e. <br />DTays (0) , <br />Resolu~ion declared ~doptecle <br />[~]r. Slesener introduced the ~ollowing resolution and movecl <br />its ac7optiona <br />RI;SOI.,UTIOIV N0. f39-0-3f35 ° VAC[~T7 NG TFI[~T I~O.P.TION <br />OF DTADE[lU ROAD I~DJI,C}32JT `~CO LOTS 3 11D7~J Sv F;LOCY. 1•, <br />SOUTIS~.P.D7 SI,OP}:S tI~JDITION <br />`.Che foregoing resolution was duly seconded by T~1r. I,zV~J.le. <br />11yes (4•) Blesner, LaValle, Co].lova, Fahey. <br />I`.T1YS (~.) uCclS'LP.. <br />Resolution cteclarec~ adoptecl. <br />POOSAI,IS Fahey openeci the public hearinc~ to consi_c~er the fin11 <br />I~UD Plannecl Unit Development pro~~osal. f:or a sho.~~~~ing center and <br />PUP,LIC single-farnily residential subdi.vision at Rice Street ancl <br />F;L'.?~RING County Road C e <br />Fahey reportec~ that the Pl.anni.ng Coramis>ion vo~ed G to 1 <br />recommending approval of the application, 7'he L~lanning <br />Cornrni,ssion also ~~~proved a finding of fact thlt the projecf: <br />is consistcnt with tYie Com~rehensive Plan. I7owever, the <br />Planning Commission tool< the posi.tion that Plan A is <br />preferable ~o Plan Be <br />Scalze asked the status of the drainage plan ior tYie <br />~YO~Ouc1~. e <br />7'he City Pngineer reported that he has r~viewcd the dr~iraage <br />plan and fincls it to k>e adequate in so far as this <br />development proposal is concernecl. The Enc~ineer sta~c~d that <br />there are some clrainac~e probl.ems down t~he line to~oZrds Pound <br />L1ke that need to be acldresse~l, There is an unc~ersized pi.pe <br />coming out oz Tona L~ne that shouJ.d be taken care of> The <br />13oosa].9.s develo~ment ~~roposal is proposing to ernpty into <br />Lkais pi.pe, <br />Page i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.