Laserfiche WebLink
P~IINUTisS <br />City Counci]. <br />Auc~ust 23, ].909 <br />ciitch abru~4:ly ends and ~here as an erosion problem 1s a <br />re~ult. Panzer was also concerned ~Yz~t if the c7itch is <br />piped, there will be a loss of. trees as a result ~-ahich serve <br />as a buf£er for the Round Lake 7'rails Townhomes. Panzer <br />agreed vaith Pierce that it would be better to direct <br />drainage from the I3oosalis project to County Road C. Panzer <br />~•~anted rnore inforrnation on drainage. <br />Fahey again pointed out that a full drainage report would be <br />given at the Se~tember 6th rneeting, Fahey poin~ed out that <br />the Council can act on the proposal betore it this eveninc~ <br />cont9.ngent uPOn clrainage concerns being resolv~c~. Fahey <br />~>ointed ouf that there ar.e tc~ao u~ays £or the draanage to c~o, <br />either to F.ound Lake or to County Roac7 C, Pahey stated hkiat <br />it was not realistic to deny the ~rojec~ b~cluse of the <br />potential for loss of trees. Fahey statedP th1~., if <br />possible, drainage ~~~ill be directed to Councy P.oad C, <br />Elosaevero tYie ~roject should not be deniec1 and the poten~i.a1 <br />for increasing the Cicy's tax base los~, because of trees< <br />Panzer was concerned with approving a project before <br />drainage concerns have been resolvecl. <br />Fahey ~ointed out that the City Engineer just receivec~ the <br />drainage ~lans and ~he Watershed is in the process oi <br />reviewing these plans. The Ca.ty Council ~vill nof have a <br />full re~ort on drainage until the Septeniber 6th meetinge <br />Panzer u~as concerned with the o~,mership of the buffer area <br />of trees, stating that he has been unable to determine this, <br />Scalze suggested that it rnay be more espensive to F~ipe <br />drainage to Round Lake than it would be to direct drainage <br />to County Road C. <br />Blesener pointed out that elevations may ~revent drainage <br />from being da.rected to County Road C. <br />Panzer sta~ed tkiat he had no argument with the developmen~ <br />as ~>roposed, his only concern is ~,~here drainage ~vi11 go. <br />Pierce again expressed concern that drainage issues have not <br />been resolved by toniyht's meeting, <br />Sill Suchy ~ointed out that one oF the tenants for the <br />pro~osed shopping center ~ddition is 1 liquor store, Suchy <br />t~ias concernecl with a lie~uor store being locatecl near 1 clay <br />care center and a church. <br />Fahey pointed out that a liquor store is a permitted use <br />under the zoning of the property. <br />P].esener pointed ou'c that the licjuor store that 4voulcl be <br />movi_ng into the sho~ping center is an existing business <br />~~iithin the City, <br />Page 9 <br />