08-23-89 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P~1IIVUTFS City Council August 23, 19II9 from the City Pnc~ineer. on th9.se The Ci.ty Fnqineer r.eported that Z~ the hearing on September 6th, he will have estimated costs oE the imnrovernent o~hicka will include the cost of any easements that axe necessary. I'ahey asked af ~here was anyone from the general public present u~ish9.ng to be heard on this matter, Don Pierce, Ion1 Lane, lsked if the City wil.l force pcople k~aving property along the proposed cul-de-sac f:o qive up a portion oi their property for. the cul-de-sac. E'ahey poa.nted out that the City has t~vo optionse che zi.rst being that the road enc~ tem~orarily before the proposed cul-de--sac and leave it until the back oi the County Roar] C properties develop, and the second Fioulcl be to ace~uire easements for the cul-de-sac and x~ut the entire stree~ in, The City e~ould pay the property o~,mers for easements fhat ~vould be necessary for the cul-de-sac. Tlae City ~lanner suggested anof:her o~tion. '.Che City could c~es9gn the cul-cle-sac so that it is entirely on the ap~licant°s proper~y and this would elim9.nate the need for easements Lrom the County Road C pro~erty owners, Council discussecl this and fe7.t this option ~aas prezerable, and the least controversial. o~ the options. Pierce reported that rir. Ltoosalis has sent copies of. ~>11ns ~o the ei'fected property o~~mers, ho4aever, Pierce ~ointec~ out that the plans uaere just received today and the pro~erty o~aners did not have adequatc time to revie~v them. Pierce reported that ~he drainage ~roblern does not exi.st on the 13oosalis property, but downstream. Pierce stated tkaat he di.d not want his pr.oper'cy condemned €or a drainage casement. Pierce ~eas concerned ~hat he 4~~ould lose trees as a result. Pierce stated tkzat tkae drainage from the I3oosali.s project cannot be pu~ into the open ditch as a.t exists, Pierce fE1t the preferable solution was to direct drainage with see•~er to County Roac~ C. Pierce did not £eel ~hat the drainage from the Foosalis property should cross resiclentiaJ. pro~erty via easernents, but rather yo to existi.ng storm seF~er on County Road C. F'ahey staLed that he understands that drainaye i.s the big concern of tkie adjacent propert~ owners, and }?ointecl out that the C9.ty Engineer wi].l have a full re~>ort on SEptember 6th. Pierce commen~ed on his inabi7.il:y to deterrnine ~aho owns the existing ditch in the area, and also comrnented that during a heavy rain that di.tch ovexfJ_ows, Don I?anzer, Round T,ake Trail 'L'o~~nl~orne Z~ssociation, asiced ~ahere ~aater. ~~~i.11 go, Panzer repor'cecl tlaat the existinc~ Page F3