My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 12:49:39 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:39:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Amend MN Statutes to clarify that tax increment pooling limitations are calculated <br />on a cumulative basis; <br />•Increase the ability to pool increments from other districts to support projects; <br />•Expand authority for all cities to transfer unobligated pooled increment from a <br />housing or redevelopment TIF district to support a local housing trust fund for any <br />eligible expenditure under Minn. Stat. § 462C.16; <br />•Modify the housing district income qualification level requirements to allow the levels <br />to vary according to individual communities and/or to support deeply affordable <br />units; <br />•Continue to monitor the impacts of tax reform on TIF districts and if warranted <br />provide cities with additional authority to pay for possible TIF shortfalls; <br />•Allow for the creation of transit zones and transit-related TIF districts in order to <br />shape development and related improvements around transit stations but not <br />require the use of TIF districts to fund the construction or maintenance of the public <br />transit line itself unless a local community chooses to do so; <br />•Allow TIF eligibility expansion to innovative technological products, recognizing that <br />not only physical items create economic value; <br />•Support changes to TIF law that will facilitate the development of “regional projects”; <br />•Shift TIF redevelopment policy away from a focus on “blight” and “substandard” to <br />“functionally obsolete” or a focus on long range planning for a particular community, <br />reduction in greenhouse gases or other criteria more relevant to current needs; <br />•Encourage DEED to do an extensive cost-benefit analysis related to <br />redevelopment, including an analysis of the various funding mechanisms, and an <br />analysis of where the cost burden falls with each of the options compared to the <br />distribution of the benefits of the redevelopment project; <br />•Consider creating an inter-disciplinary TIF team to review local exception TIF <br />proposals, using established criteria, and make recommendations to the legislature <br />on their passage; <br />•Encourage the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more efficient and <br />streamlined reporting process. There are an increasing number of noncompliance <br />notices that have overturned longstanding practices or limited statutorily defined <br />terms. <br />54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.