My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
01-08-2025 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2025 12:49:39 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:39:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MA-12 NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION <br />The State of Minnesota must contribute additional financial resources, particularly in <br />the areas of transportation and transit, community reinvestment, affordable housing <br />development, and the preservation of parks and open space. If funding for regional <br />infrastructure is not adequate, cities should not be responsible for meeting the growth <br />forecast set forth by the Metropolitan Council; <br />•The Metropolitan Council and Legislature must work to pursue levels of state and <br />federal transportation funding that are adequate to meet identified transportation <br />and transit needs in the metropolitan area; <br />•The Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and <br />continue to work with cities in a collaborative, incentives-based manner; <br />•The Metropolitan Council must recognize the various needs and capacities of its <br />many partners, including but not limited to cities, counties, economic development <br />authorities and nonprofit organizations, and its policies must be balanced and <br />flexible in their approach; <br />•Metropolitan counties, adjacent counties and school districts must be brought more <br />thoroughly into the discussion due to the critical importance of facilities and <br />services such as county roads and public schools in accommodating forecasted <br />growth; and <br />•Greater recognition must be given to the fact that the “true” metropolitan region <br />extends beyond the traditional seven-county area and the need to work <br />collaboratively with adjacent counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the cities <br />within those counties. The region faces environmental, transportation, and land use <br />issues that cannot be solved by the seven-county metro area alone. Metro Cities <br />supports an analysis to determine the impacts of Metropolitan Council’s growth <br />management policies and infrastructure investments on the growth and <br />development of the collar counties, and the impacts of growth in the collar counties <br />on the metropolitan area. <br />Metro Cities opposes statutory or other regulatory changes that interfere with <br />established regional and local processes to manage growth in the metropolitan region, <br />including regional systems plans, systems statements, and local comprehensive <br />plans. Such changes erode local planning authority as well as the efficient provision of <br />regional infrastructure, disregard established public processes and create different <br />guidelines for communities that may result in financial, environmental, and other <br />impacts on surrounding communities. <br />Metro Cities recognizes the Metropolitan Council’s efforts to compile and maintain an <br />inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for providing local <br />communities with additional information and technical assistance. The state and <br />region play significant roles in the protection of natural resources. Any steps taken by <br />the state or Metropolitan Council regarding the protection of natural resources must <br />recognize that: 68
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.