12-27-89 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL December 27, 1989 The City Planner replied that it is not intended that the easements be in favor of the City. The Planner stated that he is confused as to why the proposed property line is down the middle of the track and not to the side of it. Blesener replied that he assumes that the School District is trying to retain as much property as possible and not have the property line too close to the building. Fahey asked if the City cares from a legal standpoint if the property line runs down the middle of the track. The City Attorney replied that it does not appear that the City has any interest. The Planner questioned if 916 sells the property if the cross easements would still be valid. Blesener pointed out that both school districts have first-right-of-refusal on the propertieso Flynn stated that there is an agreement between the school districts for shared use of recreational facilities. Flynn also reported that the position of the property line dividinq the property was thought to be the logical place for it by both school districts. Council discussed the park charge for the property and thought that, if applicable, it should be suspended at this time as long as the property would be used as a recreational facility and is available to the City for recreational use. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 89-12-617 - APPROVING THE PROPERTY DIVISION OF THE CAPITAL VIEW SITE AS PROPOSED BY SCHOOL DISTRICT #623 SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT DATED DECEMBER 12, 1989 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF RECOMMENDATION #1, AND SUSPENDING THE PARK CHARGE FOR THE SUBDIVISION AS LONG AS THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ON SITE ARE AVAILABLE FOR USE TO THE CITY The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Fahey. Ayes (4) Blesener, Fahey, Collova, Scalze. Nays (1) LaValle. Resolution declared adopted. Page 12