Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />February 28, 1990 <br />request feeling it was inappropriate since there is no <br />hardship. Fahey stated that he would be willing to <br />amend the PUD Agreement to give the developer the third <br />pylon sign, however. Fahey felt that if this subject <br />had been brought up when the PUD Agreement was being <br />negotiated, the Council would have given Boosalis the <br />third pylon siqn for Rapid Oil. <br />Scalze disagreed pointing out that the Council would <br />have referenced the Sign Ordinance. <br />Boosalis stated that after reviewing the Sign <br />Ordinance, his firm anticipated having two pylon signs <br />for each phase of the center. Therefore, when Rapid <br />Oil tried to obtain a permit for their pylon sign, he <br />was surprised when the City rejected the application. <br />Boosalis reported that while the initial plans did not <br />show two pylons at each shopping center phase, later <br />plans did show two pylons at the second phase in <br />addition to the already existing pylon at the first <br />phase. <br />The Planner replied that the initial site plan <br />submitted for the second phase of the shopping center <br />showed one additional pylon. When the process was at <br />the buildinq permit stage, revised plans were submitted <br />showing a second pylon for the second phase. However, <br />this site plan was not the one reviewed by the Council. <br />Boosalis reported that the boards he presented showing <br />the relationship of the second phase to the Townsley <br />property did show two pylons for this phase. <br />Fahey asked what the Planner's opinion would have been <br />had the separate pylon for Rapid Oil been proposed <br />initiallye <br />The Planner replied that his interpretation would have <br />been that Rapid Oil is a part of the shopping center <br />complex, therefore, a separate pylon would not be <br />allowed under the provisions of the ordinance. <br />Boosalis felt that if there had been two separate <br />developers for the two shopping center phases, the City <br />would have allowed two pylons for each phase. Boosalis <br />felt the center was being unfairly restricted. <br />LaValle asked the height of the pylon proposed for <br />Rapid Oil. <br />Page 4 <br />