04-25-90 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL APRIL 25, 1990 Scalze was concerned that should the property be sold in segments, that the Council have review and approval of ingress and egress agreements. Blesener pointed out that a lot split would be required in order for the property to be sold in segments, thus ensuring that the Council would have controle Fahey asked if approval of the amended PUD Agrement would impact the City's ability to enforce the PUD Agreement or City Ordinances. The City Attorney stated that there would be no impact. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 90-4-211 - APPROVING THE REVISED TWO S PROPERTIES PUD AGREEMENT BASED ON THE CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT DATED MARCH 23, 1990 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Collova, Scalze, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. SHOULDER Blesener reported that the shoulder paving improvements PAVING - proposed by the County for County Road D and Little COUNTY RD. D Canada Road include regrinding the street as well as & LITTLE overlay. Blesener pointed out that in the case of CANADA ROAD Little Canada Road, the County has it in their plans to totally reconstruct the street with curb and gutter in 1995 if the overlay does not occur. However, if the overlay occurs, the reconstruction improvement will be placed in the County~s 12-year cycle and may not occur for the next 15 to 20 years. Blesener reviewed the Public Works Superintendent's recommendation not to overlay, but to request the reconstruction of Little Canada Road. Council agreed with that recommendation. The City Engineer also supported the reconstruction of Little Canada Road rather than overlay improvement. The Engineer suggested that the County be informed that it is the feeling of the City that the overlay is not in its best interests at this time. Page 13