Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 1990 <br />PUBLIC The Mayor opened the public hearing to consider the <br />HEARING adoption of an ordinance amending Section 910 of the <br />GROCERY Little Canada City Code, regardinq convenience store <br />STORES IN uses in B-1, making this use a Conditional Use rather <br />B-1 than Permitted Use. The Planning Commission <br />recommended approval. <br />There was no one from the general public presenting <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Scalze, seconded by LaValle, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following Ordinance and <br />moved its adoption: <br />ORDINANCE N0. 332 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 910 <br />OF THE LITTLE CANADA CITY CODE, KNOWN AS TAE LITTLE <br />CANADA ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING CONVENIENCE STORE <br />USES IN B-1, LIMITED NEIGABORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICTS <br />The foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Collova, Fahey, Blesener. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />ORDINANCE Fahey reviewed the proposal for a Sign Ordinance <br />AMENDMENT amendment regulating number and location of free- <br />FREE- standing signs at shopping centers. Fahey pointed <br />STANDING out that the Planning Commission has recommended that <br />SIGNS the existing Sign Ordinance not be amended. <br />The City Planner reviewed his report dated June 11, <br />1990 on this matter as well as a graph showing the sign <br />setbacks that would be allowed by surveyed cities. <br />Scalze stated that based on her review of the <br />information submitted by the City Planner comparing <br />what other cities' allow, Little Canada's Ordinance <br />appears to be the most liberal. <br />The Planner reported that the Planning Commission does <br />not feel the Ordinance should be changed. It was their <br />feeling that the second free-standing sign allowed aC <br />shopping centers by conditional use permit should <br />continue to be allowed in this manner, however, subject <br />to setting up some conditions that would need to be <br />met. The Planning Commission was not in favor of <br />allowing any more than two free-standing signs. <br />Page 16 <br />