08-08-90 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 8, 1990 Blesener pointed out that Slumberland could pay the entire cost, and if Lots 14, 15, or 16 connected to the watermain the property owners could pay their share at that time. Blesener asked if the alternative gave Slumberland an ample water supply and looped the system. The City Engineer replied that it did. Paul Kaufman, representing Slumberland, reported that Slumberland would be willing to pay the entire cost of the Engineer's alternative since they would be the only one using the line. Fahey agreed with Blesener's suggestion that should Lots 14, 15, or 16 connect, they would be assessed their fair share of the cost of the watermain at that time, and Slumberland would be reimbursed. Blesener pointed out that the lots will probably develop backing up to the industrial park. Should that happen, Noel Drive would be extended and watermain would be looped through Noel Drive and up to County Road D. The City Engineer pointed out the existence of a large oak tree in the street right-of-way for DeSoto Street. The Engineer suggested that the watermain could be placed as far east as possible so that it does not damage the root system of the tree. There may be the need for a construction easement, however, from the property owners to the east. It was pointed out that the tree is registered with the State Historical Society, therefore, the tree cannot be disturbed. One property owner to the east expressed concern that the easement would be very close to her home. Fahey felt the City should try to work around the tree and in order to do this, cooperation from the adjacent property owners is necessary. One resident of the area stated that he would like to see the tree preserved. This resident was also concerned that the landscaping that Slumberland has been required to do on their property has not yet been done. He was told that Slumberland was waiting until the watermain extension was completed. Page 5