09-26-90 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Scalze asked if the developer would submit a sign plan that could be reviewed by the Council. Blesener stated that as long as the sign met the requirements of the Ordinance, there was no need for Council to review a sign plan. Brueggemann reported that he would have the architect submit a sign plan for Council information. Collova suggested that the issue of landscaping be addressed, with the City requiring submission of a landscape plan. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 90-9-433 - APPROVING THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLAN REVIEW AND LOT SPLIT FOR KANDICE HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK PHASE II SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 AND SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF THE APPROPRIATE PARK CHARGE AS WELL AS SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION OF THE VACATION ISSUE ON COUNTRY DRIVE AND NADEAU ROAD The foreqoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. Ayes (4) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 90-9-434 - REQUIRING THAT LEB DEVELOPMENT SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THEIR PHASE I DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. Ayes (4) Collova, Scalze, LaValle, Blesener. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. SPRINGSTED Rusty Fifield, Springsted, appeared before the Council on the issue of Springsted's study into the advanced refunding of the City's 1983 General Obligation Improvement Bonds and 1985 General Obligation Refunding Improvement Bonds. Fifield reported that their analysis has shown that the City could save $35,000 by refunding these bond issues, however, the analysis has shown that it may not be in the City's best interests to do so. Page 20