Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 10, 1990 <br />authorization to print the additional sets, this is <br />what he was doing. <br />The Administrator reported that although Kroos did not <br />specifically ask for additional reimbursement, it was <br />his understanding that he was asking for authorization <br />of costs over and above the $2,000 cap. While it was <br />obvious that the additional documents needed to be <br />printed, he never agreed that the City was responsible <br />for these additional costs. The Administrator agreed <br />that an inordinate amount of plan sets were needed, <br />however, this was necessary in order to get the bids <br />for the project. The Administrator recommended that <br />the City pay for the additional printing of document <br />sets, but not totally amend the reimbursable clause. <br />Kroos asked about additional printing costs through the <br />duration of the projects. Kroos also pointed out costs <br />for disbribution of field notes. Kroos reported that <br />if the City desires, one copy of information could be <br />forwarded to the City with the City doing the copying <br />and distribution. Kroos reported that customarily <br />there is no cap on reimbursables, and stated that his <br />firm is just askinq to be reimbursed for actual <br />expenses. <br />Fahey was concerned with the tone and approach of the <br />architect and felt that the architect was required to <br />do a professional job for the City. <br />Kroos replied that his firm intends to do a <br />professional job, but is making a request. <br />Fahey asked if the costs were verifiable why the City <br />would not pick them up. <br />The Administrator replied that this is the Council's <br />call. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-10-459 - APPROVING THE CHANGE IN <br />CONTRACT WITH BOARMAN & ASSOCIATES CALLING FOR THE CITY <br />TO COVER ADDITIONAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES FOR PRINTING <br />AND TRAVEL FOR THE FIRE STATION AND CITY CENTER <br />PROJECTS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION OF THOSE EXPENSES <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, Fahey, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />The City Attorney reported that as Mr. Kroos indicated <br />Page 14 <br />