My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-90 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
10-23-90 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:04:39 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 23, 1990 <br />also reported that costs associated with the trunk <br />sewer were to have been spread out over the benefiting <br />properties, and not just his 11 lots. <br />Boosalis passed out another hand-out labeled "Original <br />Intent" wherein he calculates bond and project costs <br />coming up with a TIF surplus of $25,946. Boosalis <br />recommended that this surplus be divided on a per lot <br />basis to reduce the assessment, resulting in a revised <br />assessment amount of $11,634. Boosalis pointed out <br />that the TIF Agreement states that the TIF surplus <br />would be used primarily for payment of the bonds and <br />interest thereon. <br />Fahey stated that it was not the Council~s <br />understanding that all the TIF surplus would be used <br />for this project. Fahey pointed out that this was not <br />indicated in the Development Agreement which indicates <br />that Boosalis would agree to an assessment of $13,000 <br />per lot. <br />Boosalis pointed out that the TIF Agreement tells the <br />Legislature how the City will use the excess increment. <br />Boosalis pointed out that there is actually enough <br />surplus to reduce the assessment to $10,010 per lot. <br />Boosalis also pointed out that under his first proposal <br />to have Rosewood Drive come in from County Road C <br />further east, the County installed a water tap on <br />County Road C for the project, and his lots were <br />assessed $650.00 per lot for a waterline that is of no <br />use. Rosewood Drive was moved over because of the <br />change in the way the TIF was to be allocated. <br />Boosalis again stated that $10,000 to $11,00o was <br />discussed as a reasonable assessment for the lots, and <br />Boosalis felt that the savings should be passed on by <br />the City and the assessment reduced to the $11,634 he <br />is proposing. <br />Fahey again pointed out that the Development Agreement <br />contemplates a maximum assessment of $13,000 per lot. <br />Blesener replied that the Council indicated that the <br />assessment would not be more than $13,000 and that TIF <br />would pick up any costs over that amount. Now the <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.