My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
10-24-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:04:56 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 24, 1990 <br />PLANNING Collova reported that the Planning Commission Chairman <br />SEMINARS has requested that Commissioners be authorized to <br />attend some upcoming planninq seminars. Registration <br />costs are $75.00 per seminar per person. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-10-501 - AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE <br />FOR ATTENDANCE AT A PLANNING CONFERENCE FOR ANY <br />PLANNING COMMISSIONER INTERESTED <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Fahey, Scalze, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />PIONEER PARK Scalze reported that the Park Commission has tabled <br />action on the Planning Commission's recommendation that <br />the issue of platting lots along the east side of <br />Pioneer Park be studied. The Park Commission would <br />like some additional time to study the matter. <br />Scalze pointed out that the City Council and Park <br />Commission had previously considered this suggestion <br />prior to the purchase of the property. Scalze pointed <br />out that the property was purchased with donated money, <br />and she strongly felt that when gift such as these are <br />accepted, the City should not then turn around and sell <br />a portion of the property. <br />Fahey felt that selling lots <br />park would have an unfavorab <br />Fahey stated that he did not <br />homes adjacent to their park <br />are instances of parks being <br />existing homes. <br />along the <br />le impact <br />see other <br />property, <br />developed <br />east side of the <br />~n the park. <br />cities building <br />however, there <br />adjacent to <br />Blesener felt the Council should table the matter until <br />the Park Commission has an opportunity to make a <br />recommendation. Blesener agreed that the matter was <br />discussed when the rezoning of the ~roperty was <br />considered. <br />Collova stated that he <br />not in favor of the id~ <br />in favor. <br />Fahey pointed out that <br />the circumstances were <br />Page <br />remembers the discussion and was <br />aa at that time and is still not <br />when the matter was discussed, <br />different, and the City later <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.