My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-29-91 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
10-29-91 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:11:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:54:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 29, 1991 <br />Hanson asked if the 55 cents per square foot took into <br />account the legal costs the City incurred in acquiring <br />the Pioneer Park property. <br />The City Administrator replied that it did not. The 55 <br />cents was raw land costs. If there were buildings on a <br />particular property, there were additional costs to the <br />City for acquiring those buildings. <br />Blesener reported that the $2 per square foot cost was <br />chosen since this was a price that was quoted as fair <br />at one point when the City was discussing the <br />possibility of Costa Lane extending north to Allen. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the $2 figure <br />was a negotiated one and is not based on an appraisal. <br />Blesener pointed out that the City used TIF to write <br />down land acquisition costs in the Country Drive area <br />to $1.35 per square foot. <br />The City Administrator reported that actual acquisition <br />costs were in the $3 per square foot range, however, <br />that figure included more than raw land. <br />Blesener asked if the $2 per square foot price was fair <br />for industrial property. <br />Collova suggested that the price should be verified, <br />and Council discussed the possibility of having an <br />appraisal done. It was estimated that a certified <br />appraisal would cost $500. <br />Scalze pointed out that the City had appraisals for the <br />Country Drive land, and the $3 per square foot figure <br />was not out-of-line. The Country Drive property may <br />have been better property, therefore, Scalze did not <br />feel the $2 per square foot figure for the DeSoto <br />easement was excessive. <br />The City Administrator again indicated that the $2 <br />figure was a negotiated figure, and pointed out that <br />the Country Drive property was written down to $1.35 <br />per square foot. <br />Blesener felt the $1.35 figure was too low. <br />Scalze pointed out that Mr. Costa does not feel he <br />should pay anything for the easement. Scalze suggested <br />that the City would be settinq a precedent by <br />negotiating property values at an assessment hearing. <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.