Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 27, 1991 <br />stated that a CPA would put a greater financial burden <br />on his organization. <br />LaValle again pointed out that the four other <br />organizations are comfortable with the requirement. <br />Matson did not believe that restrictions above State <br />requirements will offer the City any further <br />protection. Matson pointed out that annual audits <br />would be prepared by a CPA, that gambling organizations <br />are audited by the Department of Revenue, the Gambling <br />Control Board and the Attorney General. <br />Scalze pointed out that the ordinance is more <br />restrictive than State Law because the City felt the <br />need for this since the State Gambling Control Board <br />has not been able to police gambling organizations to <br />the extent they should. Scalze pointed out that it is <br />the City's right to be more restrictive. Scalze again <br />pointed out that not all Council Members agreed on all <br />points in the Ordinance. Scalze stated that she felt <br />comfortable with the Ordinance as drafted, and did not <br />want to debate it again. <br />Matson stated that having a CPA prepare monthly reports <br />will not guarantee the accuracy of those reports. <br />Matson pointed out that the City will have the 3% for <br />enforcement, and that is where the City's control lies. <br />Hanson reported that other organizations have informed <br />him that having a CPA prepare monthly reports is not a <br />big dollar item. Therefore, Hanson supported leaving <br />the provision in the Ordinance, with the possibility of <br />relooking at it in the future. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following ordinance and <br />moved its adoption: <br />ORDINANCE N0. 351 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 815 <br />OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA <br />REGULATING LAWFUL GAMBLING AS PRESENTED BY THE CITY <br />ATTORNEY <br />The foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Blesener, Hanson. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />AMENDING The City Attorney reported that he has reviewed the <br />COMMERCIAL submittals from Briggs and Morgan regarding amendment <br />REVENUE NOTE to commercial development revenue note of 1981 for <br />YORKTON Yorkton Industrial Building B, and these submittals <br />INDUSTRIAL appear to be in order. <br />BULDING B <br />Page 8 <br />