My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-92 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
06-10-92 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:20:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:54:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 10, 1992 <br />LaValle suggested that secretarial time for the thesis <br />work not be taken from the education allowance, but <br />normal payroll allocations. <br />The City Administrator asked about vacation accrual, <br />notinq that when he was hired he started with 80 hours <br />of vacation. The Administrator reported that the <br />City's personnel policy allows for the carrying over of <br />10 days of vacation per calendar year, and under that <br />policy he has lost 5 days of vacation. The <br />Administrator reported that this has also happened with <br />other City employees. <br />Blesener stated that the policy was intended to <br />encourage employees to take their vacation, not to <br />cause employees to lose vacation, and it was the <br />consensus of the Council that these "lost" vacation <br />days should be recovered. <br />The City Administrator also noted that his contract <br />calls for a long-term disability plan in the same <br />amount as provided to other City employees. The <br />Administrator noted that there is no long-term <br />disability plan in place for City employees. <br />Council suggested that the City Administrator obtain <br />quotations for this coverage, and present it at the <br />budget workshop meeting. It was also suggested that <br />the Administrator determine what other cities provide <br />in this area. <br />Blesener reported that as an overall rating he felt the <br />Administrator exceeded expectations. LaValle agreed <br />and felt that the City had been fortunate in its <br />selection of the City Administrator. LaValle felt that <br />the City Administrator has achieved a cost savings to <br />the citizens of Little Canada, and was a real benefit <br />to the entire City. <br />Scalze agreed that the City Administrator has done a <br />good job for the City, and noted that the staff works <br />well together. Scalze also thanked the Administrator <br />for the assistance that he has provided to her. <br />The Administrator stated that it was a pleasure working <br />for Little Canada, and noted the good working <br />relationship that the Mayor and City Council have. <br />There being no further business, the meeting was <br />adjourned <br />Attest: <br />ruyc v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.