Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 16, 1992 <br />The City Engineer reported that he has approached the <br />County about contributing to the cost of the storm <br />sewer project, and they have indicated that they will <br />pay for only their portion of the drainage area. The <br />Engineer noted that the Edgerton lateral which is <br />proposed would be a benefit to both the City and the <br />County. The Engineer suggested that this portion of <br />the storm sewer project could be bid as an alternate so <br />the City can review the cost and decide whether it is <br />feasible to proceed with that portion of the <br />improvement based on the cost. <br />The City Administrator indicated that if staff does not <br />feel the County is willing to contribute their fair <br />share, it would be staff's recommendation to not <br />proceed with that portion of the project. <br />Mrs. Neamy again indicated that her lots face Vanderbie <br />and not LaBore Road. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the Neamy house <br />faces LaBore Road, therefore, Vanderbie would be <br />considered the side lot. The Administrator indicated <br />that he would be happy to review the situation with <br />Mrs. Neamy with regard to previous Council action on <br />the division of her property, as well as the <br />orientation of her lots. <br />Ms. Torala asked if she could have her assessments <br />deferred until she sells her property. <br />The City Administrator stated that he would be happy to <br />work with Ms. Torala, and asked that anyone with any <br />questions please call. <br />Mrs. Neamy pointed out that her proposed property <br />division was approved by the Council on the condition <br />that she remove a portion of her garage. Mrs. Neamy <br />stated that she does not intend to do this. <br />The City Administrator suggested that he review past <br />meeting minutes on this issue and review the situation <br />with the City Planner. <br />There was no one else present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Hanson, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />The Mayor pointed out that the improvement hearing was <br />initiated by the Council, therefore, it will require a <br />4/5ths vote to approve. <br />Page 14 <br />