Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 28, 1992 <br />organizations are paying under $300 per session. The <br />Administrator pointed out that using the average or <br />median rent analysis, the rents being paid at the <br />Little Canada Bingo Aall could not meet current State <br />Law requirements. <br />The Administrator also reviewed the rental rates for <br />office and commercial space provided by Mover's <br />Warehouse and noted that he added his information for <br />comparison purposes. This information shows that <br />rental rates range from $8 to $18.25 per square foot <br />based on size of space, amenities and the deal <br />negotiated. <br />The Administrator reported that the rental analysis he <br />did of the Mover's Warehouse information shows that <br />most rents are under $300 per session, with very few <br />approaching $400 per session. These numbers may have <br />to be increased, however, to include expenses for <br />janitorial services, utilities, etc. <br />The Administrator reported that the indication of all <br />this information to the committee was that rents are <br />based on the amount of square footage involved, and <br />most organizations are renting less than 12,00o square <br />feet. Rent controls do exist under State Statute based <br />on square footage. It was also evident to the <br />committee that market competition does not exist under <br />the present situation, and the committee explored how <br />the City would approach this matter. <br />Two options seemed evident. The City could either <br />dictate rents by ordinance or let the market decide a <br />fair rate. The first option is possible because State <br />Law gives the cities the ability to be more restrictive <br />in the area of charitable gambling than State Law. <br />However, the committee questioned how the City would <br />determine what amount of square footage should be <br />rented or what a fair market rent would be. The <br />committee felt that these issues may not be appropriate <br />for the City to decide. The second option discussed <br />involved letting the market determine the rent by <br />creating a competitive situation. The City can amend <br />the ordinance to allow another bingo hall license. The <br />concern the committee had with allowing another bingo <br />hall was with finding a way to rotate bingo sessions <br />between the two halls and other logistical issues. <br />The Administrator pointed out that there is a proposed <br />ordinance in the agenda that would set rents for bingo <br />hall sessions by ordinance. The committee discussed <br />this option, but determined it was not the preferred <br />approach. The committee feels that the charities would <br />be best served by gettinq together and developing a <br />unified approach that would resolve the situation, but <br />if that does not occur, the City has the option of <br />legislating a solution. <br />Page 9 <br />