Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 15, 1992 <br />There was no one else present from the general public <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Scalze, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92-12-454 - APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT TO EXPAND A <br />HOUSE LOCATED AT 2354 G <br />MR. JOHN GRABRICK BASED <br />PLANNING COMMISSION AND <br />NON-CONFORMING SINGLE-FAMILY <br />REENBRIER CIRCLE AS REQUESTED <br />ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE <br />CITY PLANNER <br />BY <br />The foreqoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (4) Blesener, LaValle, Hanson, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92-12-455 - DENYING THE VARIANCE FOR <br />TWO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 2354 GREENBRIER CIRCLE AS <br />REQUESTED BY MR. JOHN GRABRICK WITH THE UNDERSTANDING <br />THAT MR. GRABRICK CONTINUE TO NEGOTIATE FOR THE <br />PURCHASE OF AN EIGHT-FOOT STRIP OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY <br />FROM HIS NEIGHBOR, MR. RYAN, AND INSTRUCTING MR. <br />GRABRICK TO SEND THE CITY ANY CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN <br />HIMSELF AND MR. RYAN ON THIS ISSUE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Blesener, Scalze, Hanson, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />FINAL Hanson opened the public hearing to consider final plat <br />PLAT approval for Costa Estates Third Addition. <br />COSTA <br />ESTATES Mr. Bob DeBace appeared before the Council representing <br />THIRD the Costa family. DeBace reported that at the Planning <br />ADDITION Commission meeting, the Commission recommended approval <br />of the final plat subject to a small strip of property <br />being included in the plat to prevent access to Costa <br />Lane from the Bruhn property. DeBace reported that he <br />discussed this with the County Surveyor, who has <br />recommended that Lot 1 be redrawn to angle off slightly <br />to block access by the Bruhn property to the street. <br />The County prefers this solution since it wants to <br />eliminate the platting of small parcels. <br />Scalze pointed out that legally Mr. Bruhn could not <br />divide his property. <br />Page 4 <br />