My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-93 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
03-10-93 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:34:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 10, 1993 <br />items, and pointed out that the issue is not clear-cut. <br />The Administrator agreed that there are some grey <br />areas. Another criteria the committee looked at was <br />whether or not items would be reoccurring or one time <br />expenses. <br />Morelan stated that he understood the reasoning, but <br />did not agree. <br />Scalze reported that the need for a City Center ID sign <br />was discussed by the Community Pride Committee who felt <br />the sign was long overdue and should be moved up on the <br />priority list. <br />Morelan asked the reasoning for cutting the funding for <br />updating the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The City Administrator reported that $17,500 was the <br />original estimate by the City Planner for a complete <br />update of the plan. It was felt that perhaps the <br />updating process could be spread out over two years, or <br />perhaps the entire plan did not need to be updated, but <br />only sections of it, focusing on redevelopment areas. <br />Scalze ~sked how much of the $31,000 the Council was <br />willing to spend at this time. Scalze also noted that <br />there is some indication that as part of any CDBG <br />funding the City might receive for bringing the old <br />fire station up to ADA requirements, the City may be <br />required to participate in the cost. <br />The City Administrator reported that the City has made <br />application for $55,000 in CDBG funding to bring the <br />old fire station up to safety and code requirements. <br />The Administrator reported that he recently met with a <br />review committee for the grant funding, and the comment <br />was made that the City should participate more in the <br />cost of this project. <br />Scalze felt that the City should hold back some of the <br />$31,000 at this time. <br />LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 93-3-59 - APPROVING THE FUNDING OF THE <br />FIRST FIVE ITEMS ON THE 10% GAMBLING-CIP PRIORITY <br />LISTING AND INSTRUCTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO <br />COORDINATE TAE PURCHASE OF THESE ITEMS AS NECE55ARY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Scalze, Pedersen, Hanson. <br />Morelan (1) Morelan. Resolution declared adopted. <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.