Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 10, 1993 <br />FRATTALONE The City Administrator reported that Mr. Frank <br />RECYCLING Frattalone has informed him that he has not been <br />OPERATION successful in his efforts to secure an alternative <br /> location for his recycling operation located on Country <br /> Drive. Therefore, Mr. Frattalone has indicated that he <br /> will be coming in to make application for permanent <br /> approval of his current operation. Mr. Frattalone has <br /> been advised that he will have to apply for a text <br /> amendment that would allow a Conditional Use Permit for <br /> his business. The Administrator reported that Mr. <br /> Frattalone will be meeting with the City Planner on <br /> March 16th to discuss the matter, with possible <br /> presentation to the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council in April. <br />FUNDING The City Administrator reviewed his report dated <br />PRIORITIES March 5th regarding the recommendation of the 10% <br />10% Gamblinq-CIP Prioritization Committee with regard to <br />GAMBLING- capital improvement requests. The Committee has <br />CIP MONIES recommended funding of 13 items during 1993. The City <br /> currently has $31,000 in 10% gambling funds on hand, <br /> and it is estimated that an additional $32,000 in funds <br /> may come in during 1993. The Administrator reported <br /> that the question for the Council is how far down the <br /> list should items be funded, or whether or not the <br /> Council agrees or disagrees with the priority <br /> established by the Committee for these items. <br />Pedersen felt that the process went well, and that the <br />committee did a good job in prioritizing the capital <br />improvement requests. Pedersen pointed out that not <br />all individuals involved would have ranked the listing <br />as it was ranked, however, enough members did so that a <br />consensus was reached. <br />Scalze asked if there was a total consensus to rank the <br />requests as they were rather than go to just a pure <br />ranking. <br />LaValle replied that the majority of the committee <br />members felt that items necessary for the operation of <br />the City should be paid for from the operation budget. <br />It was felt that the 10% qambling monies should not be <br />used to subsidize the City's operating budget, but <br />rather for items that would not normally be funded. <br />Morelan agreed, but questioned the reasoning for <br />including Item #5 on the list. Morelan indicated that <br />if flammable storage cabinets are an OSHA requirement, <br />they should be paid for from City's operating funds. <br />Pedersen felt the same argument could be made for other <br />Page 11 <br />