My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-93 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
04-14-93 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:35:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:55:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 14, 1993 <br />Pipeline and the Highway Department could be assessed. Sprain <br />reported that he was not interested in bearing additional cost for <br />the water main project because the water main cannot be placed in <br />the street right-of-way due to the location of Williams Bros. <br />pipeline. Sprain felt that an assessment for the water main of <br />$9,600 was totally out of the question. Sprain felt that the <br />economic benefit to the property owners was closer to $3,000 to <br />$5,000. Sprain also felt that a 50/50 assessment split between <br />the property owners and the City was high. <br />Pedersen suggested that if Sprain felt a 50% assessment was high, <br />how could he feel the City should pick up more than 50%. Pedersen <br />asked how the City's picking up a large share of the cost of <br />providing water main to eight residents could be justified. <br />Sprain pointed out that the differences in the Viking Drive <br />project versus a typical water main project is that the water main <br />cannot be installed in the street right-of-way, the extension of <br />water main south on Edgerton to access Viking Drive, the fact that <br />only one side of the street is available for assessment. <br />Pedersen asked if the location of Williams Bros. pipeline was the <br />City's problem. <br />The City Administrator noted that typically water main <br />construction occurs in the paved area of the street and as a <br />result, restriction increases the cost of the projeot. By not <br />working in the street, costs associated with this project may <br />actually be less. <br />The Engineer indicated that the City typically waits for a street <br />reconstruction project to install underground utilities to avoid <br />the cost associated with street restriction. <br />Sprain pointed out that the street and utility project on the <br />other side of Highway 36 was assessed at a rate of $3,700 per lot. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that this project is not <br />eligible for State funding since the road does not meet the <br />criteria necessary for designation as a State Aid street. The <br />Administrator reported that the City is discussing with the State <br />Highway Department their participation in the cost of upgrading <br />Viking Drive since the street is within their right-of-way. <br />However, this won't impact the water main project. <br />Morelan pointed out that the cost of the project is set, the <br />question is the amount of participation by both the homeowners and <br />the City. <br />Sprain asked why isolated areas such as Viking Drive were not <br />watered when the majority of the City was done in the early <br />1970's. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.