My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-93 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09-22-93 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:39:57 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:55:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 <br />Mr. Gordie Howe, Masterpiece Homes, reported that a <br />home was designed to be constructed on this particular <br />lot, but after the design was complete and the lot <br />surveyed, it was determined that the house would fit <br />the lot better if it were twisted to follow the <br />cul-de-sac. Howe also pointed out the setbacks of the <br />houses to the north and south and reported that given <br />those setbacks, he asked the City Planner about the <br />possibility of a front yard setback. The Planner <br />suggested that rather than move the house forward, the <br />house be angled on the lot and a side yard setback <br />considered. <br />Howe reported that he has discussed the proposed side <br />yard setback variance with the adjacent neighbors, <br />initially as a variance to the north, but later as a <br />variance on the south side yard. The neighbor to the <br />south indicated that the house should be further <br />forward on the lot. That property owner has a <br />three-season porch and she is trying to protect her <br />privacy as well as trees and undergrowth in the back <br />yard area. <br />Scalze reported that she was present during a portion <br />of Mr. Howe's conversation with the neighbor to the <br />south, and she did not get the feeling that property <br />owner was sure that a variance to the south was the way <br />to go. Scalze pointed out that the City Planner's <br />report addresses the issue of a variance on the north. <br />Howe reported that the property owner to the south does <br />not oppose a house being constructed on the lot, but <br />wants to save as much of her back yard as possible. If <br />the house is built straight on the lot, more trees will <br />be lost in both the back and front of the house. Howe <br />reported that Scalze made a comment on site that the <br />house may be too big for the lot. Howe reported that <br />the lot is designed for an L-shaped split, however, <br />that is not the type of house that would fit in the <br />area given the $300,00o property values. <br />Scalze pointed out that economic considerations cannot <br />be used as the basis for granting a variance. Scalze <br />stated that after listening to part of the conversation <br />between Mr. Howe and the neighbor to the south, she was <br />not sure what the property owner wanted. <br />Howe reported that the property owner would agree to <br />the angling of the house in order to save trees in the <br />back yard. <br />Dr. Capsner, property owner to the north, reported that <br />there are two large, mature trees at the northeast <br />corner of the lot that would be saved by moving the <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.