My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-94 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
03-09-94 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:44:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:55:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCFI 9, 1994 <br />controlling the access to and use of the park through a <br />joint powers agreement. Uban pointed out that in <br />comparing the townhome development to single-family, <br />there would be less hard surface with a townhome <br />development, less disturbance of the shoreline, no <br />docks, and the townhome development would perform much <br />better environmentally for the lake. The townhomes <br />would meet a market need and add to the diversity of <br />housinq stock in Little Canada. <br />Pedersen pointed out that Little Canada does not have a <br />significant number of homes over $200,000 in value, <br />therefore, a single-family home development of this <br />type would also add to the diversity of the City's <br />housing stock. <br />Uban pointed out that the townhomes would be in the <br />$200,000 plus range. <br />Scalze pointed out that a townhome development for this <br />site has not been proposed in Vadnais Heights. <br />Uban reported that the townhome development works best <br />on the Little Canada property due to the natural <br />amenities of the site. Uban reported that the Little <br />Canada site is more difficult to develop because of the <br />grading that would be required as well as the <br />significant number of trees. Uban also pointed out <br />that the City would have control of the site through a <br />homeowner's association. <br />LaValle stated that everyone is concerned with the <br />environment. LaValle pointed out that the long-term <br />residents of the area bought their property relying on <br />the R-1 zoning of the north side of the lake. If the <br />property owners in the area are sayinq that they can <br />live with an additional 10 or 12 docks on the lake, <br />that was fine with him. LaValle stated that based on <br />the feelings of those residents, he could not support <br />the rezoninq to R-2. <br />Uban reported that they have met with some of the <br />residents, and there was not universal opposition to <br />the townhome development. Uban pointed out that the <br />Planning Commission has recommended in favor of the <br />rezoning and townhome development concept, and the Park <br />& Recreation Commission was shown how the development <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.