My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-94 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
07-13-94 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:47:32 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 13, 1994 <br />does not incur any expenses. <br />LaValle pointed out that the Council informed the <br />residents on both Centerville Road and DeSoto Street <br />that the park would not be used in this manner. <br />Pedersen pointed out the investment in Pioneer Park and <br />felt that it should be used for an occasional <br />charitable event. Pedersen pointed out that the park <br />is not lit and this would be strictly a day-time event. <br />Morelan felt the park should be used as long as <br />liability concerns are addressed. <br />Hanson suggested there may be concern on the part of <br />the Sheriff's Department with the request. LaValle <br />agreed. Hanson felt there were a lot of questions, and <br />suggested that perhaps the applicant has the answers. <br />However, she is not present this evening. <br />LaValle pointed out that there are professional people <br />who run ball tournaments. LaValle felt action on the <br />matter should be tabled until the applicant is present <br />to answer the Council's questions. <br />Morelan felt that although a final decision could not <br />be made this evening, the applicant should be given <br />some indication of how the Council feels about this <br />matter since time is of the essence. <br />Pedersen felt that if the applicant cannot answer the <br />concerns raised by the Council, then the answer would <br />be no. Pedersen felt the Council should establish <br />under what terms and conditions it would this use of <br />the park. <br />LaValle again pointed out that the property owners in <br />the area were told that the park would not be used in <br />this manner. <br />Morelan did not believe the property owners would be <br />upset with this type of park usage, and would <br />understand the situation and support it. <br />LaValle disagreed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.