Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECENIBER 21, 1994 <br />Scalze noted the comments on page 17 of the Plan whioh <br />include the Minnesota Street area as an auto-related <br />area. Scalze felt this was a down-grade for the area <br />and did not feel the vacant property in that area <br />should be identified as auto-related. Scalze pointed <br />out the fitness club and proposed townhome development <br />in the area. Scalze stated that she did not want to <br />see gas stations developed in that area as she felt <br />they would not be a good fit. <br />LaValle agreed, and felt that identification of this <br />area as auto related could result in problems with a <br />potential applicant proposing an auto body shop in the <br />area. <br />The Planner stated that one of the issues is to better <br />identify what auto-related commercial is in Little <br />Canada. The Planner asked if the Council preferred to <br />see the area identified as regional commercial. <br />Scalze felt that would be a better fit, pointing out <br />the school in the area as well as proposed townhome <br />development. Scalze felt that the City should err on <br />the side of demanding higher standards for an area <br />rather than lower. <br />The Planner stated that the biggest impact of this plan <br />for Rice Street is the land use changes for the <br />existing mobilehome parks. <br />Scalze asked why the City would be impacted by the need <br />to replace low and moderate income housing since the <br />City is fully developed. <br />The Planner replied that that was a State and regional <br />issue and one the City may have to deal with. Due to <br />the City's housing breakdown, there may be no impact, <br />but this is something the City needs to pay attention <br />to. <br />Scalze pointed out that Little Canada has a lot of low <br />income housing while other cities do not. <br />The Planner stated that he wanted to be sure the City <br />addressed the issue. <br />Scalze suggested that there may be other ways to <br />address it than replace low income housing should the <br />25 <br />