My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:31:00 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />J~1NiJARY 18 , 19 9 5 <br />alignment #2 is that the water main and hydrants would <br />be located in an easily maintainable area. <br />Disadvantages are that the location is dependent on MN <br />DOT approval, and there is the need to remove 500 to <br />800 feet of street due to the close proximity of the <br />Highway 36 ramp. The Engineer noted that he also <br />included an option 2B which includes street <br />reconstruction. Estimated cost of Option 1 is $94,300, <br />Option 2 is $104,000, and Option 3 is $180,300. <br />Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general public <br />present wishing to comment on the project. <br />Homer Rector, owner of Lot 31, pointed out that his lot <br />is vacant. Rector stated that he favored the water <br />main improvement, and had no strong feelings about the <br />road. As far as he was concerned, the existing road <br />serves the purpose. Rector stated that alignment #1 <br />was acceptable to him. <br />Fahey pointed out that City Staff is recommending that <br />the roadway be reconstructed. <br />Scalze asked how soon Public Works would estimate the <br />road would need reconstruction, given its present <br />condition. <br />The Public Works Superintendent reported that a portion <br />of the road is in fairly good shape, however, that is <br />the area which must be dug up for the water main in <br />order to avoid the Highway 36 ramp. The remainder of <br />the road is in poor shape, and about one-third would <br />have to be replaced in the fairly near future. <br />Scalze asked if this was the opportune time to replace <br />the road, or should the City wait. <br />A property owner asked where the water main would go. <br />Fahey replied that staff is recommending that the water <br />main be placed on the south side of the road, which <br />eliminates the need for additional easements, tearing <br />up driveways and loss of trees. However, it is a <br />little more expensive to place the water main in this <br />area. Fahey pointed out that the cost of water main to <br />the property owners would be capped at $4,600 per lot. <br />Rector pointed out that there would be a cost <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.