My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:31:00 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />J.~NUARY 18, 1995 <br />reconstruction project would involve a new road with <br />new base and pavement. <br />Scalze asked if the State turns back the road right-of- <br />way to the City if there would be enough room to <br />position the cul-de-sac on the City's right-of-way to <br />avoid trees. <br />The Engineer stated that he was not sure where the <br />State would draw the right-of-way line as of yet. <br />There was no one present from the general public <br />wishing to comment further on this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Morelan, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />LaValle pointed out that the assessment policy <br />established a$45 per front foot assessment rate for <br />property owners. <br />The City Administrator estimated the rate for the <br />Viking Drive property owners in the $40 to $45 per <br />front foot range. Should bids come in low for the <br />project, the benefit of those low bids would accrue to <br />both the City and the property owners. <br />Gustafson asked when the water main project would <br />begin. <br />The City Engineer anticipated construction to begin in <br />the Spring, with completion by the end of August. <br />Kreeger asked if entry would be maintained for the <br />property owners during the construction. <br />Fahey replied that access would be kept open for both <br />property owners and emergency vehicles. However, <br />access may be inconvenient at times. <br />The Engineer reported that at most access may be closed <br />for a few hours during the working day, but not for <br />long periods of time. <br />Rector asked how property owners would pay for the <br />project. <br />The City Administrator replied that the property owners <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.