My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-95 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
02-22-95 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:32:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:56:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINiTPES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 22, 1995 <br />maintenance issue of the road with the Administrator. <br />Anderson pointed out MN DOT's past actions in <br />resurfacing the Viking Drive loop and providing access <br />to the area via County Road B-2. Anderson asked if the <br />Council felt that the property owners had a basis for <br />claiming State participation in trie project. <br />Fahey stated that the City had no problem with City <br />staff requesting that the State participate in the cost <br />of the improvement since they participated in the <br />original road improvement. <br />Anderson pointed out that the State will maintain <br />jurisdiction over the loop area. Anderson reported <br />that Mr. Ericson has indicated that a portion of the <br />road is on his property and off the easement area. <br />Anderson asked that the City consider extending the <br />road improvement to the Ericson's driveway. <br />Morelan asked if the easement extended to the Ericson's <br />driveway, and if not, would the Ericson's be willing to <br />dedicate the necessary easement. <br />Anderson replied that Mr. Ericson has indicated that <br />the easement is there. <br />Scalze asked about the 30 foot easement running east <br />and west, and whether those property owners were <br />willing to dedicate this easement. Scalze also asked <br />why the road should not be widened beyond the 18 feet <br />proposed if there is to be a cul-de-sac at the end. <br />The City Administrator reported that the 18 foot width <br />works given the existing uses in the area including <br />trees, driveway impact, fences, and the powerline. <br />Fahey pointed out that all these issues can be <br />addressed in time for a change-order to the 1995 <br />improvements. The concept being proposed at this time <br />is a 30 foot easement with an 1S foot wide street mat, <br />and a 12 foot wide street mat for the looped area. The <br />concept could be approved subject to resolution of <br />easement issues and verification of issues discussed. <br />Fahey asked the reaction of the neighborhood to the <br />one-way option. Fahey felt that a two-way would <br />require a wider street mat. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.