Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 1995 <br />proposal has been on the table for the past 6 months. <br />Fahey pointed out that a moratorium is consistent with <br />what the Council has done in other areas of the City <br />when it is proceeding cautiously. <br />Morelan suggested that should the Council decide to <br />require a weighted majority for variances to the <br />Subdivision Ordinance based on the recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission, the action just taken by the <br />Council to change the vote to simple majority will look <br />to the public like the door was opened for a particular <br />proposal. <br />Mrs. Judd stated that should a moratorium be placed on <br />subdivision variances, the Tima lot split proposal will <br />not be submitted to the Planning Commission until the <br />vote issue is resolved. Judd questioned the confusion <br />on the vote issue as well as the timing. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 95-3-91 - DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON <br />VARIANCE REQUESTS UNDER THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE <br />PENDING FURTHER REVIEW AND ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL <br />UPON RECEIPT OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Morelan. <br />Ayes (2) Fahey, Morelan. <br />Nays (3) Scalze, Pedersen, LaValle. <br />Resolution denied. <br />MISSION Scalze suggested that the proposed Mission Statement be <br />STATEMENT revised changing the word "maintain" to "enhance" in <br />the fourth paragraph, and adding the work "high" after <br />"in" in the sixth paragraph. Council agreed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 95-3-92 - INSTRUCTING THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />TO FORWARD THE PROPOSED CITY MISSION STATEMENT TO CITY <br />COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND CITY STAFF FOR COMMENT <br />20 <br />