Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 1995 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Morelan. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Morelan, Fahey, Scalze, Pedersen. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />II~LOYEE Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />HEALTH moved its adoption: <br />INSUI2ANCE <br />RESOLUTION NO. 95-3-93 - APPROVING THE OFFSET OF <br />ADDITIONAL COST IN EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THE <br />MONTH OF MARCH BY THE CITY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY <br />ADMINISTRATOR IN HIS LETTER DATED MARCH 17, 1995 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Pedersen, Morelan, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />1995 SEWER Council reviewed the City Administrator's proposal for <br />RATES 1995 Sewer Rates as outlined in his memo dated March <br />17, 1995. Morelan asked if sewer rates for commercial <br />users would be based on water usage each quarter rather <br />than winter quarter only. <br />The Administrator replied that that was correct <br />pointing out that many commercial users have separate <br />meters for watering. <br />Morelan stated that in comparing the proposed rates <br />with those of surrounding cities, the commercial rate <br />is equal to that of the other cities. The residential <br />rate, however, is somewhat higher than average. In <br />looking at the impact to residential users, some will <br />see a tremendous increase. Morelan felt that in some <br />cases that increase was too much for one year, and <br />suggested that it be limited to a maximum of 100% <br />increase. <br />The Administrator reported that limiting the maximum <br />residential increase in sewer rate to 100% will result <br />in a decrease of $5,800 in revenue. The Administrator <br />felt that this decline in projected revenue is still <br />adequate for the budget. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />21 <br />