Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 15, 1995 <br />presented this evening are conceptual. The consultants <br />are now coming back to the City to determine if what is <br />being presented is a reflection of what the community <br />wants. <br />Fifield reported that the first town meeting was held <br />on May 31st to gather information from the public on <br />how they currently view the Rice Street/Little Canada <br />Road area and what they would like to see in the <br />future. After the town meeting, three workshops were <br />held each focusing on different aspects for coming up <br />with a tool the City can use to guide development <br />decision in the Rice Street/Little Canada Road area. <br />That resulted in the consultants drafting a vision <br />statement for the area as well as a series of <br />development concepts. Fifield reported that before the <br />final document is prepared, the consultants are now <br />coming back to the public to ensure that what has been <br />developed thus far reflects the needs and desires of <br />the community. <br />Fifield recapped the results of the May 31st town <br />meeting, including responses to four questions which <br />were asked at that meeting. The first question dealt <br />with people's vision for the area and what they would <br />like to see 15 years from today. Fifield reported that <br />118 responses were received, were detailed, and gave <br />some clear ideas such as family restaurant, additional <br />senior housing, grocery store, etc. The second <br />question asked people to identify what they liked about <br />the area. Groups identified 75 things that they like <br />about the Rice Street area. These responses were <br />grouped into uses, qualities, and environmental. 45% <br />dealt with specific uses, but no single use stood out. <br />Groups liked a variety of qualities about Rice Street. <br />A key environmental characteristic was Round Lake. <br />Next participants were asked to identify the most <br />important changes that need to be made in the area. 51 <br />responses were received. 37% dealt with qualities, the <br />most common was making the area an attractive and <br />convenient place to shop. Suggested improvements <br />included paths, roads and area identity. Uses were the <br />least common form of chanqe suggested. And finally, <br />participants were asked to identify barriers to makinq <br />the changes that have been suggested. Physical, <br />financial and attitudes were listed as barriers. <br />Fifield reported that the information gathered at the <br />town meeting was important in shaping the work done to <br />date. The approach has been to try and look at all of <br />the factors and forces that will shape and guide <br />development in this area. Fifield reported that his <br />2 <br />