My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-95 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
10-11-95 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:37:50 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 11, 1995 <br />hand, the Council can relook at the issue. LaValle <br />pointed out that a$15,000 contribution will put excess <br />dollars into the fund. <br />Fahey stated that at a minimum he would like to see a <br />$17,160 contribution, and would support $18,000. <br />Morelan indicated that he would support $18,000. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that $18,000 has <br />been provided for in the proposed 1996 Budget. <br />Scalze, LaValle, and Pedersen supported a$15,000 <br />figure. Pedersen felt the amount should be $15,000 at <br />this time, and if the survey shows the benefit level is <br />too low, the City contribution can be increased. <br />LaValle and Scalze agreed. <br />Fahey indicated that by setting the level at $15,000, <br />the City is facing the likelihood that a larger <br />contribution will be needed in the future. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the City has no <br />choice but to contribute $14,872 to support a$2,100 <br />benefit level. If the City contributes more, that is <br />planning for the future. The Administrator stated that <br />he would like to see some closure to this issue so that <br />the Council does not need to debate it each year. <br />Scalze requested a recommendation from the City <br />Administrator on this issue. <br />The City Administrator next reviewed the proposal to <br />make the Recreation Assistant position full-time as of <br />July 1, 1996. The Council was in support of this <br />proposal. <br />Morelan asked if the Administrator increased his tax <br />collection projection. <br />The Administrator replied that he left that projection <br />at 97%. <br />Morelan asked when the League notifies the City of the <br />amount of its insurance dividend. <br />The Administrator replied that the City should have <br />this information in early to mid December. The City <br />Administrator also pointed out that the 1996 Budget may <br />realize some savings in that there will be two new <br />Public Works employees hired, replacing employees at <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.