My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-95 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
10-24-95 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:38:14 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 24, 1995 <br />Marvin & Cynthia Shelley, 124 Old County Rd. C; <br />Edwin & Dorothy Strand, 123 Old County Rd. C; <br />Rockne Waite, 2651 Lakeshore; <br />Marie M. Wildes, 2688 Lakeshore; <br />Lorrie Bruce, 2604 Jackson; <br />Roger & Fatima Lawson, 2704 Lakeshore; <br />John & Maria Marzitelli, 168 Old County Rd. C; <br />Thomas & Victoria Carmack, 2721 Lakeshore; <br />James & Sandra Weidt, 106 Old County Rd. C; <br />Glenn & Lena Guertin, 2727 Lakeshore; <br />Jeffrey A. Jensen, 2731 Lakeshore; <br />Al1en Engebretson, 154 Old County Rd. C; <br />Harold Feickert, 2590 Jackson; <br />James Gunderson, 2683 Lakeshore; <br />Frank Frison, 146 Old County Rd. C; <br />David & Linda Solnitzky, 147 Old County Rd. C; <br />William Hastings, 2660 Lakeshore. <br />A property owner asked if the road does not hold up and <br />must be redone within 5 to 6 years, if the property <br />owners would be reassessed. <br />The City Administrator replied that the assessment <br />policy grants provisions for the unexpired life of a <br />street. If the deterioration was related to the <br />quality of this job, there would have to be a fair <br />resolution to the situation. It would likely that the <br />City would pay for the project in this type of <br />situation. <br />Fahey noted that routine maintenance and repairs would <br />not be assessed. <br />The City Administrator also noted that there is a two- <br />year warranty for the project with the contractor. The <br />City holds a bond for that two-year period. <br />The City Engineer stated that the bond would cover <br />defects in workmanship and labor. <br />There was no one else from the general public present <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Morelan, seconded by Scalze, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 95-10-239 - REDUCING THE ASSESSMENT RATE <br />FOR IMPROVEMENT N0. 93-11 FROM $43.67 PER FRONT FOOT TO <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.