My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-96 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
02-14-96 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:46:27 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 14, 1996 <br />The Building Official replied that the accessibility <br />code requires an accessible interior route from one <br />level to another and to every room. If the City were <br />to maintain both levels for assembly purposes, an <br />elevator or ramp would have to be added to the building <br />to provide handicapped access between the two floors. <br />Morelan suggested that the City might lease one of the <br />floors to a business, thus there would be two different <br />entities occupying the building. Morelan asked if the <br />Code would still require accessibility between the two <br />levels. <br />The Building Official replied that was his <br />understanding of the Code. <br />Fahey suggested that the City Attorney give the Council <br />a legal opinion on the accessibility issue. Fahey <br />suggested that it did not make sense to require <br />handicapped accessibility between two floors of a <br />building when each floor is being used by different <br />entities. If this is the case, Fahey suggested that a <br />meeting with local Legislators was in order. <br />The Building Official reported that the State has <br />adopted the UBC as part of its State Building Code. <br />The Buildinq Official indicated that he checked his <br />interpretation with the State on the issue of access <br />between levels, and they indicated that his <br />interpretation was correct. There is an exception for <br />areas 3,000 square feet or less, but the exception does <br />not apply to public buildings. A public building is <br />defined as any building funded with State or Local <br />money. <br />Fahey asked if the building were deeded to LCRA or the <br />Historical Society whether the exception would apply. <br />The Building Official pointed out that this was a <br />possibility, but he thought the building exceeded 3,000 <br />square feet. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that if the building <br />were condo'ed off, handicapped accessible restrooms <br />would be needed on each level. There would also be the <br />expense of drafting and recording the legal documents <br />to turn title over to the various organizations. The <br />Administrator pointed out that the handicapped <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.