Laserfiche WebLink
MINiJTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 27, 1996 <br />The Planner reported that the Planning Commission <br />suggested that the I-P Zoning be extended to align with <br />Vanderbie. <br />Scalze pointed out that there are houses in the area <br />which would be affected by the rezoning. <br />Fahey pointed out that it is the expectation of the <br />people living along Al1en Avenue that the property to <br />the north would remain residential. Fahey felt it <br />would be an imposition to rezone this area, and he <br />would not support it. <br />Another option which the Council discussed was <br />extending the I-P zoning east to Edgerton, and south <br />only as far as the powerline easement, using the <br />exposure to the freeway. <br />Pedersen suggested that if the I-P zone is extended to <br />this degree, there is no reason to rezone the McCumber <br />property. <br />Scalze pointed out that there are residential homes <br />along County Road D west of Edgerton. <br />Fahey suggested that the homes could be a part of a <br />redevelopment project. <br />Knudsen pointed out that'the powerline is a natural <br />buffer for the area. However, the McCUmber property <br />directly abuts residential. <br />Pedersen pointed out that there is commercial property <br />across the street as well as the freeway. <br />Morelan agreed that the powerline and Edgerton 5treet <br />would make a natural boundary for the zoning. <br />After further discussion the Council felt that the I-P <br />zoning should not extend east of Vanderbie nor south of <br />the powerline. <br />The Planner pointed out that if the McCumber property <br />is rezoned, it will be a legal non-conforming use. <br />Scalze suggested that the word "consider" be taken out <br />of the reference to rezoning the McCumber property. <br />The City Planner pointed out that the direction is to <br />retain the single-family zoning on the north side of <br />Demont abutting Savage Lake. <br />9 <br />