05-22-96 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MAY 22, 1996 out that both the City Planner and Planning Commission have recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on this matter. Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Pedersen, the public hearing was closed. Morelan asked if it were possible to add the additional accessory space onto the existing garage rather than Mr. Regnier putting up another free-standing structure. Regnier reported that the ceiling is quite low on the existing garage and his van will not clear the door. Regnier also pointed out that he needs additional storage space for his vehicles. Morelan stated that he has no problem with the additional accessory space, but was not comfortable with two free-standing garages. Morelan indicated he could understand the need for two structures if it is not feasible to add onto the existing garage. Fahey pointed out that the City has not required additional accessory space be added onto existing structures in the past. Morelan reported that he reviewed past requests, and found only one resulted in two free-standing structures. Most CUP requests for additional accessory space have existing garage space attached to the house. LaValle pointed out that the proposal will not impact the neighbors and noted that the property backs up to the freeway. Morelan felt a stipulation should be any replacement of the existing garage with another garage must meet all City setback requirements. The City Planner reported that if the existing garage is replaced, another Conditional Use Permit would be required. If the applicant did not want to meet setback. requirements, a variance would have to be applie<1 for. The Planner also indicated that it would be his preference the new garage be attached. Morelan asked if the City could prohibit the existing garage from being rebuilt if there was need to do so in 2