My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-96 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
06-26-96 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:48:46 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 26, 1996 <br />examples of regional commercial development. <br />Neighborhood commercial means customers come from the <br />surrounding area to shop. <br />Pedersen indicated that there was not enough land to <br />attract a reqional commercial business to develop in <br />this area. <br />Fahey stated that the property will remain B-3 and <br />instructed the Planner to ohange any references within <br />the Comp Plan accordingly. <br />Len Notto stated that B-3 Zoning places too many <br />restrictions on his property. <br />Scalze felt it was the size of the property which <br />restricts its uses. <br />The Planner reviewed the southwest quadrant of the west <br />side of the freeway. The Planner noted that the Comp <br />Plan talks about maintaining the land use patters of <br />the area, upgrading housing quality, and the likelihood <br />of low-density sinqle-family residential development in <br />this area. <br />The Planner reported that another public hearing is <br />scheduled for Wednesday, July 10th, at 6:30 P.M. to <br />consider the Comp Plan update for the east side of the <br />freeway. After that hearing, the Comp Plan update will <br />be revised to include any chanqes the Council feels <br />appropriate. The Comp Plan can then be adopted subject <br />to revi_ew and approval of the Metropolitan Council. <br />Once that is done, the City can consider whether or not <br />any zoning changes are necessary. <br />Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general public <br />present wishing to comment on this matter. There were <br />none. <br />Upon motion by Morelan, seconded by Scalze, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 96-6-143 - TABLING ACTION ON ADOPTION OF <br />THE COMPREHEN5IVE PLAN UPDATE PENDING FURTHER REVIEW, <br />WITH ACTION TO BE TAKEN AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE JULY <br />10, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE <br />EAST SIDE OF THE FREEWAY <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.