Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 27~ 1996 <br />BONDS SERIES 1996B FOR CEDARS LAKESIDE APARTMENTS <br />PROJECT~ <br />*APPROVING FACILITY USE REQUEST MADE BY CITY STAFF <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Pedersen, Morelan, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CLOSED The City Attorney requested the Council go into closed <br />SESSION session near the end of the meeting to discuss pending <br />litigation. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 96-11-291 - CALLING FOR A CLOSED SESSION <br />NEAR THE END OF THE REGULAR MEETING TO DISCUSS PENDING <br />LITIGATION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Morelan, Fahey, Pedersen. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />5URVEY ON Fahey reviewed the survey prepared by City staff on <br />SHED shed setbacks in surrounding cities, as well as their <br />SETBACXS recommendation for a three foot side and rear yard <br />setback for an accessory shed which requires no <br />building permit. <br />Scalze pointed out that most of the surrounding cities <br />have a five foot front and rear yard setback for these <br />types of sheds. <br />The City Administrator agreed, but pointed out that <br />Falcon Heights allows a one foot setback if the shed is <br />in the rear 20% of the lot. Staff is recommending a <br />three foot setback so maintenance can be performed <br />around the shed. <br />Scalze felt that sheds tended to be permanent <br />structures and felt if any violated the City's <br />standards a time limit should be given to property <br />owners to bring these sheds into conformance. Scalze <br />also felt that setbacks for accessory sheds should be <br />set at five feet from the side and rear property lines <br />since this appears to be the norm with the surrounding <br />cities. <br />6 <br />